Mortgage Corp. of America v. Stagg Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mortgage Corp. of America v. Stagg Holding Corp.

45 A.D.2d 770, 357 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 770 (Mortgage Corp. of America v. Stagg Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mortgage Corp. of America v. Stagg Holding Corp., 45 A.D.2d 770, 357 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action upon two promissory notes, commenced by service of a summons and a notice of motion for summary judgment, with supporting papers (CPLR 3213), plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 14, 1973, which denied the motion. Order reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Defendants’ failure to submit evidentiary facts in support of their claimed defenses compels the granting of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Shapiro v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y., 7 N Y 2d 56, 63). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action upon two promissory notes, commenced by service of a summons and a notice of motion for summary judgment, with supporting papers (CPLR 3213), plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 14, 1973, which denied the motion. Order reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Defendants’ failure to submit evidentiary facts in support of their claimed defenses compels the granting of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Shapiro v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y., 7 N Y 2d 56, 63). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 770, 357 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mortgage-corp-of-america-v-stagg-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack