Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co.

1 Abb. N. Cas. 290
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1876·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

I think that section 2 of the Revised Statutes, part 3, chapter 10, title 2, contemplates an actual removal by the plaintiff, after the commencement of the action, before he can be compelled to file security for costs (see Gilbert v. Gilbert, 2 Paige, 603).

Motion deMed.

Ho appeal was taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co., 1 Abb. N. Cas. 290 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

1 Abb. N. Cas. 290 (Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. B. & B. F. Gilbert
2 Paige Ch. 603 (New York Court of Chancery, 1831)