Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co.
1 Abb. N. Cas. 290
This text of 1 Abb. N. Cas. 290 (Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Morten v. Domestic Telegraph Co., 1 Abb. N. Cas. 290 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).
Opinion
I think that section 2 of the Revised Statutes, part 3, chapter 10, title 2, contemplates an actual removal by the plaintiff, after the commencement of the action, before he can be compelled to file security for costs (see Gilbert v. Gilbert, 2 Paige, 603).
Motion deMed.
Ho appeal was taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gilbert v. B. & B. F. Gilbert
2 Paige Ch. 603 (New York Court of Chancery, 1831)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Abb. N. Cas. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morten-v-domestic-telegraph-co-nysupct-1876.