Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. There are questions of [969] fact with respect to the manner in which the accident occurred and whether plaintiff Paul Mortellaro’s conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see, Weininger v Hagedorn & Co., 91 NY2d 958, rearg denied 92 NY2d 875). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
259 A.D.2d 968 (Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.