Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

259 A.D.2d 968, 688 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. There are questions of [969] fact with respect to the manner in which the accident occurred and whether plaintiff Paul Mortellaro’s conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see, Weininger v Hagedorn & Co., 91 NY2d 958, rearg denied 92 NY2d 875). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 259 A.D.2d 968, 688 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 968 (Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilbert v. Sahlen Packing Co.
267 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Karas v. Corning Hospital
262 A.D.2d 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)