Morss v. Domestic Sewing-Mach. Co.

First Circuit

Morss v. Domestic Sewing-Mach. Co.

55 F. 79, 5 C.C.A. 47, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1521

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1893

DocketNo. 12

StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. 79 (Morss v. Domestic Sewing-Mach. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morss v. Domestic Sewing-Mach. Co., 55 F. 79, 5 C.C.A. 47, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1521 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, District Judge.

We are satisfied that the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below was right, for the reasons stated in his opinion, in holding that the ribs in the defendant’s dress form, which are constructed according to the Knapp patent, and are composed of a single wire in such manner as to form a double rib, TJ-shaped at the lower ends, and extending in an unbroken piece the entire length, and supported in position by being rigidly attached to a waist hand divided into segments, can in no sense he held to he an equivalent for the combination of ribs and springs described in the first claim'of the plaintiff’s patent. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, District Judge.

We are satisfied that the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below was right, for the reasons stated in his opinion, in holding that the ribs in the defendant’s dress form, which are constructed according to the Knapp patent, and are composed of a single wire in such manner as to form a double rib, TJ-shaped at the lower ends, and extending in an unbroken piece the entire length, and supported in position by being rigidly attached to a waist hand divided into segments, can in no sense he held to he an equivalent for the combination of ribs and springs described in the first claim'of the plaintiff’s patent. Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. 79, 5 C.C.A. 47, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morss-v-domestic-sewing-mach-co-ca1-1893.