Morse v. Toppan

69 Mass. 411
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1855
StatusPublished

This text of 69 Mass. 411 (Morse v. Toppan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morse v. Toppan, 69 Mass. 411 (Mass. 1855).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

The facts being agreed, they are to be taken as of the same legal effect, as if pleaded. The fact that the defendant was a married woman, when the judgment was rendered against her, would alone be a good bar to this action. It would [412]*412be the same as if she had entered into an obligation by bond at the same time; to which she might have pleaded non est factum. A judgment is in the nature of a contract; it is a specialty, and creates a debt; and to have that effect, it must be taken against one capable of contracting a debt. Faithorne v. B'aquire, 6 M. & S. 73. Judgment for the defendant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Mass. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morse-v-toppan-mass-1855.