Morse v. Sheehan

212 P. 1119, 123 Wash. 703, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1365
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 1923·No. No. 17753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignment of error most seriously argued by the appellants is that the amount of the verdict in this personal injury action should have been reduced.

From the record, we are satisfied that, while the amount awarded by the jury is substantial, it is not excessive, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse v. Sheehan, 212 P. 1119, 123 Wash. 703, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1365 (Wash. 1923).

212 P. 1119 (Morse v. Sheehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casey v. Casey
88 So. 3d 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2012)