Morse v. Sheehan

212 P. 1119, 123 Wash. 703, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1365
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 1923
DocketNo. 17753
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 P. 1119 (Morse v. Sheehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morse v. Sheehan, 212 P. 1119, 123 Wash. 703, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1365 (Wash. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignment of error most seriously argued by the appellants is that the amount of the verdict in this personal injury action should have been reduced.

From the record, we are satisfied that, while the amount awarded by the jury is substantial, it is not excessive, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Casey v. Casey
88 So. 3d 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 P. 1119, 123 Wash. 703, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morse-v-sheehan-wash-1923.