Morse v. Rinderle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Morse v. Rinderle

64 Colo. 32

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedSeptember 15, 1917

DocketNo. 8729

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 Colo. 32 (Morse v. Rinderle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morse v. Rinderle, 64 Colo. 32 (Colo. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Garrigues

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have examined the record, briefs and opinion of the Court of Appeals in Rinderle v. Morse, 27 Colo. App. 457, and are of the opinion the conclusion reached therein, that the lower court was governed by the legal obligation rather than by equitable principles in the determination of the case, is correct. The judgment of the Court of Appeals in this regard is therefore affirmed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

Judgment affirmed.

Decision en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Garrigues

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have examined the record, briefs and opinion of the Court of Appeals in Rinderle v. Morse, 27 Colo. App. 457, and are of the opinion the conclusion reached therein, that the lower court was governed by the legal obligation rather than by equitable principles in the determination of the case, is correct. The judgment of the Court of Appeals in this regard is therefore affirmed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

Judgment affirmed.

Decision en banc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Colo. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morse-v-rinderle-colo-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack