Morse v. Naiztat Iron Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morse v. Naiztat Iron Works, Inc.

32 A.D.2d 535, 299 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 535 (Morse v. Naiztat Iron Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morse v. Naiztat Iron Works, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 535, 299 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings 'County, entered October 24, 1967 and November 16, 1967 respectively, as affect defendants other than 3720 Realty iCorp. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order, as limited, dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made only on the -trial minutes. In any event, the contentions raised on the motion were considered on the appeal from the judgment. A single bill of costs is allowed to respondents Naiztat Iron Works, Inc., and Neckman .Construction iCorp., jointly. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, .Rabin, Hopkins and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings 'County, entered October 24, 1967 and November 16, 1967 respectively, as affect defendants other than 3720 Realty iCorp. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order, as limited, dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made only on the -trial minutes. In any event, the contentions raised on the motion were considered on the appeal from the judgment. A single bill of costs is allowed to respondents Naiztat Iron Works, Inc., and Neckman .Construction iCorp., jointly. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, .Rabin, Hopkins and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 535, 299 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morse-v-naiztat-iron-works-inc-nyappdiv-1969.