Morse v. Hall

109 Mass. 409
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ames, J.

For the special and limited purpose for which this suit is brought, we see no difficulty in maintaining it. It is not a case in which complaint is made of the misuse of an established trade mark, and it does not depend upon the provisions of the first section of the, Gen. Sts. e. 56. It is not a case within that section at all. The complaint is, that the defendants continue to use, in carrying on their business, the name of a person formerly con. nected with them in partnership, but now deceased, and that they do so without the consent of his legal representatives. Thif> [411] would be a violation of the third section

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse v. Hall, 109 Mass. 409 (Mass. 1872).

109 Mass. 409 (Morse v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

China Clipper Restaurant, Inc. v. Yue Joe
45 N.E.2d 748 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Lowenstein v. Lowenstein's, Inc.
1 N.E.2d 183 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Lodge v. Weld
2 N.E. 95 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)