Morse v. Connecticut River Railroad

72 Mass. 450
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1856·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bigelow, J.*

The declarations offered in evidence were made [451] by the conductor or the baggage master, and by the station master, “ the next morning after the trunk was lost, in accounting for the trunk,” in answer to inquiries in behalf of the plaintiff". It was part of the duty of those agents to deliver the baggage of passengers, and to account for the same, if missing, provided inquiries for it were made within a reasonable time. These declarations were therefore made by them as agents of the defendants, within the scope of their agency, and while it continued. They should therefore have been admitted.

Exceptions sustained

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse v. Connecticut River Railroad, 72 Mass. 450 (Mass. 1856).

72 Mass. 450 (Morse v. Connecticut River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blair v. Security Bank
50 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1905)
Lynchburg Telephone Co. v. Booker
50 S.E. 148 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1905)