Morse v. Brunswick & Co.

34 Kan. 378
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Quriam:

The only errors discussed in this case in the brief of plaintiffs in error are those alleged to have occurred upon the trial. No motion for a new trial is contained in the record, and therefore the judgment of the district court must be affirmed. (Ferguson v. Graves, 12 Kas. 39; Nesbit v. Hines, 17 id. 316; Hover v. Cockins, 17 id. 518; Typer v. Sooy, 19 id. 598.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse v. Brunswick & Co., 34 Kan. 378 (kan 1885).

34 Kan. 378 (Morse v. Brunswick & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lennen v. Ogden
161 P. 904 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)