Morse v. Brackett

104 Mass. 494
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

This case (now for the third time) comes before the court upon substantially the same evidence as was given at the former trials. Its legal effect is the same; and it was held by this court that it proved an entire contract of sale, for the eight bales of wool, which the defendant could not rescind in part only, on discovering that one of the bales was of a different kind from that for which it was bought. The question of the entirety of the contract, after this decision, could not be submitted to the jury.

Nor was there any evidence which would justify submitting to the jury the question whether the defendant bought the bale which he returned. There was no dispute that the subject matter of the sale included all the eight bales.

In regard to the several instructions asked for on the ground that the bale in question was delivered to the defendant through the fraud or mistake of the vendor, we see no evidence in the case which made such instructions necessary.

As to the rule of damages, the instruction given was in the words of the rule stated in the former decision. See 98 Mass. 205, 210. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse v. Brackett, 104 Mass. 494 (Mass. 1870).

104 Mass. 494 (Morse v. Brackett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co.
126 A. 582 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1924)
Flint v. Newton
136 S.W. 820 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
O'Shea v. Vaughn
87 N.E. 616 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
History Co. v. Flint
15 S.W. 912 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1891)
Bassett v. Brown
105 Mass. 551 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)