Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Munson S. S. Co.

158 F. 1021, 85 C.C.A. 666, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 17, 1908·No. No. 186·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think the district judge was correct in holding that the action was upon an account stated; his reasons for so holding being fully set out in the opinion. 155 Fed. 150. As the appeal has deprived the ap-pellee of the use of a large sum of money, a great part of which was coneed-edly due to it, we think the decree should be affirmed, with interest and costs, and 5 per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Munson S. S. Co., 158 F. 1021, 85 C.C.A. 666, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019 (2d Cir. 1908).

158 F. 1021 (Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Munson S. S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United States
130 F. Supp. 336 (Court of Claims, 1955)
Newport News Iron Works, Inc. v. United States
298 F. 184 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1924)
The Hattie Thomas
262 F. 943 (Second Circuit, 1920)