Morrow v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

54 S.W. 853, 107 Ky. 517, 1900 Ky. LEXIS 130
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 12, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 54 S.W. 853 (Morrow v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 54 S.W. 853, 107 Ky. 517, 1900 Ky. LEXIS 130 (Ky. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

CHIEF JUSTICIE HAZELRIGG

delivered the opinion of the court.

TMs action was brought by J. T. Morrow and his wife "for damages' for mental anguish growing out of a failure of appellant company to- deliver promptly a telegraphic message to the husband, whereby the wife was prevented from attending the- funeral and burial of her. grandmother. On motion requiring the plaintiff to elect which cause of action they would prosecute — that of the wife or of the husband1 — they elected to proceed on behalf of the wife and the' case was so heard'.

Upon the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, a peremptory instruction for the defendant was- given, and, without motion for a new trial, this appeal is prosecuted. The pleadings authorize the judgment, and the motion for the peremptory instruction furnished merely a test of the law arising on the facts as disclosed by the proof.

."We think, under the facts shown, the law is against the [519]*519plaintiff, and the instruction was properly given. The' wife wasi not a party to the transaction or message, and there was neither averment nor proof that the message was sent with notice to the company, for the purpose of bringing her to the funeral and. burial of her grandmother.

The other legal questions attempted to be raised on the briefs growing- out of alleged errors on the trial can not be considered, for want of a motion, for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrus v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
62 P.2d 113 (Utah Supreme Court, 1936)
Sproles, Mayor v. Mauney
38 S.W.2d 969 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Crutcher
167 S.W. 138 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)
Wright v. Gamble
71 S.E. 795 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Northcutt
48 So. 553 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Parsons v. Breed
104 S.W. 766 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1907)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Schriver
141 F. 538 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)
Campbell County v. Trapp
113 Ky. 119 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1902)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ayers
131 Ala. 391 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.W. 853, 107 Ky. 517, 1900 Ky. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-western-union-telegraph-co-kyctapp-1900.