Morrow v. Wainwright

169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 100, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1933
DocketNo. 9405
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 310 (Morrow v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. Wainwright, 169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 100, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 125 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

On August 8, 1932, the clerk of the superior court of Troup County issued an execution based on a verdict and decree for alimony in favor of Mrs. Tiny Wainwright against Robert Wainwright for the sum of $360, which was for the installments due and payable for the eighteen months immediately preceding the issuance of the execution. The verdict and decree for alimony upon which the execution was based were rendered at the February term, 1914, of said court, and had not been excepted to, nor, so far as appears from this record, had there been any proceeding to change or modify the same. The execution was levied, August 10, 1932, on a part of the property described in the decree for alimony. An affidavit of illegality was filed by the administrators of the estate of Robert Wainwright, and was subsequently amended. A demurrer was sustained and the affidavit of illegality was dismissed. Held:

1. The controlling question raised by the affidavit of illegality was as to whether the decree for alimony was dormant, and whether the execution could be issued upon such a decree or judgment. Under the ruling in Fischer v. Fischer, 164 Ga. 81 (137 S. E. 821), the plaintiff was not barred by the statute of limitations, or on the ground of the dormancy of the judgment or decree, although no execution was issued on said decree until more than seven years had elapsed after the date of its rendition.

[101]*101No. 9405. May 12, 1933. Duke Davis and H. O. Harrison, for plaintiffs in error. E. T. Moon, contra.

2. Upon review this court declines to overrule the decision in Fischer v. Fischer, supra. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoncu/r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zerblis v. Zerblis
238 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Bryant v. Bryant
205 S.E.2d 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Albert v. Albert
71 S.E.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Moore v. Moore
71 A.2d 409 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1950)
Fauver v. Hemperly
173 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 100, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-wainwright-ga-1933.