Morrow v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morrow v. State

196 S.E.2d 901, 128 Ga. App. 461, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1515

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 12, 1973

Docket47756

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 S.E.2d 901 (Morrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrow v. State, 196 S.E.2d 901, 128 Ga. App. 461, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

This appeal accompanied by the trial judge’s requisite review certificate is from the trial court’s denial of the accused’s pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence, contraband drugs, discovered during a search of defendant’s residence. Appellant’s [462]*462contention is that the affidavit and oral sworn testimony given to the magistrate who issued the search warrant failed to satisfy the basic requirement of probable cause in that there was no information from which the magistrate could have determined how or when the informer obtained the information given the affiant.

Submitted January 5, 1973 Decided March 12, 1973. R. Joneal Lee, for appellant.

The factual situation here was similar to that in Grebe v. State, 125 Ga. App. 873 (189 SE2d 698) which was held insufficient to meet the tests laid down in the Federal cases discussed in Sams v. State, 121 Ga. App. 46, 48 (172 SE2d 473) and Johnson v. State, 111 Ga. App. 298 (141 SE2d 574). Accordingly, we must hold the trial court here erred. Similar rulings by this court are Fowler v. State, 121 Ga. App. 22 (172 SE2d 447); Windsor v. State, 122 Ga. App. 767 (178 SE2d 751); Gilliam v. State, 124 Ga. App. 843 (186 SE2d 290); McMiken v. State, 127 Ga. App. 66 (192 SE2d 716); Latten v. State, 127 Ga. App. 75 (192 SE2d 562); and Bell v. State, 128 Ga. App. 426.

Judgment reversed.

Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, Judge.

This appeal accompanied by the trial judge’s requisite review certificate is from the trial court’s denial of the accused’s pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence, contraband drugs, discovered during a search of defendant’s residence. Appellant’s [462]*462contention is that the affidavit and oral sworn testimony given to the magistrate who issued the search warrant failed to satisfy the basic requirement of probable cause in that there was no information from which the magistrate could have determined how or when the informer obtained the information given the affiant.

Submitted January 5, 1973 Decided March 12, 1973. R. Joneal Lee, for appellant.

The factual situation here was similar to that in Grebe v. State, 125 Ga. App. 873 (189 SE2d 698) which was held insufficient to meet the tests laid down in the Federal cases discussed in Sams v. State, 121 Ga. App. 46, 48 (172 SE2d 473) and Johnson v. State, 111 Ga. App. 298 (141 SE2d 574). Accordingly, we must hold the trial court here erred. Similar rulings by this court are Fowler v. State, 121 Ga. App. 22 (172 SE2d 447); Windsor v. State, 122 Ga. App. 767 (178 SE2d 751); Gilliam v. State, 124 Ga. App. 843 (186 SE2d 290); McMiken v. State, 127 Ga. App. 66 (192 SE2d 716); Latten v. State, 127 Ga. App. 75 (192 SE2d 562); and Bell v. State, 128 Ga. App. 426.

Judgment reversed.

Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 S.E.2d 901, 128 Ga. App. 461, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-state-gactapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack