Morrow v. State

86 S.E. 280, 17 Ga. App. 116, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 283
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 17, 1915·No. 6378·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The indictment for trespass, in which the defendant is charged with “wilfully cutting down and felling the timber and wood upon the land of W. B. Saye in Adsboro district, G. M., without the consent of the owner,” was subject to a timely special demurrer, because of indefiniteness of description of the land, though .previous statements in the indictment located the land in the county of the prosecution. W. B. Saye might have owned several different tracts of land in that district.

2. The evidence did not authorize the conviction of the accused,, and a new trial should have been granted.

.3. In view of our ruling as above given we deem it unnecessary to pass upon the other assignments of error. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. State, 86 S.E. 280, 17 Ga. App. 116, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 283 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 280 (Morrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newsome v. State
675 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Burbank v. State
96 S.E. 1043 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Baker v. State
90 S.E. 983 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)