Morrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morrow v. State

436 So. 2d 243, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21505

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1983

DocketNo. 83-1467

StatusPublished

This text of 436 So. 2d 243 (Morrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrow v. State, 436 So. 2d 243, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21505 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the state’s affidavits filed below in this case and in the absence of the state’s concessions as made in Endress v. Coe, 433 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we cannot say that the result reached by the circuit judge herein conflicts with Endress, supra, or otherwise departs from the essen[244]*244tial requirements of law. Therefore, this petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of the state’s affidavits filed below in this case and in the absence of the state’s concessions as made in Endress v. Coe, 433 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we cannot say that the result reached by the circuit judge herein conflicts with Endress, supra, or otherwise departs from the essen[244]*244tial requirements of law. Therefore, this petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 So. 2d 243, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack