Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Morrow v. Redding

Morrow v. Redding

108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 308, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 853
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1921·No. 12070·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in overruling the motion to set aside the judgment in this ease. See Chance v. State, ante, 307 (108 S. E. 249). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Morrow & Morrow, for plaintiff in error. W. C. Mundy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. Redding, 108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 308, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 853 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

108 S.E. 250 (Morrow v. Redding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chance v. State
108 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)