Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Morrow v. Redding

Morrow v. Redding

108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 308, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 853
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1921
Docket12070
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 250 (Morrow v. Redding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. Redding, 108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 308, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 853 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in overruling the motion to set aside the judgment in this ease. See Chance v. State, ante, 307 (108 S. E. 249). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Morrow & Morrow, for plaintiff in error. W. C. Mundy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chance v. State
108 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 308, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-redding-gactapp-1921.