Morrow v. North Carolina Exploration Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Morrow v. North Carolina Exploration Co.

178 S.E. 549, 207 N.C. 875, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 297

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 27, 1935·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

There was no evidence at the hearing of this proceeding by the North Carolina Industrial Commission tending to show that the death of plaintiff’s husband, A. G. Morrow, was the result of an injury by accident, or was the result of an occupational disease. For this reason, the award of the Commission denying compensation to the plaintiff in this proceeding was properly affirmed by the judge of the Superior Court. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

There was no evidence at the hearing of this proceeding by the North Carolina Industrial Commission tending to show that the death of plaintiff’s husband, A. G. Morrow, was the result of an injury by accident, or was the result of an occupational disease. For this reason, the award of the Commission denying compensation to the plaintiff in this proceeding was properly affirmed by the judge of the Superior Court. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Morrow v. North Carolina Exploration Co., 178 S.E. 549, 207 N.C. 875, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 297 (N.C. 1935).

Pincite

178 S.E. 549 (Morrow v. North Carolina Exploration Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.