Morrow v. Kingsbury

California Supreme Court

Morrow v. Kingsbury

1 Cal. Unrep. 884

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1875

DocketNo. 4504

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 884 (Morrow v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrow v. Kingsbury, 1 Cal. Unrep. 884 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

RHODES, J.

— The title to the land in controversy (it being a portion of a sixteenth section) vested in the state upon the approval of the survey of the township, unless there existed a valid pre-emption right to the land acquired under the act of Congress of March 3, 1853, the act granting the sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections to the state: See Sherman v. Buick, 45 Cal. 665.

The settlement, as appears by the declaratory statement, was not made until the year 1870, which was not within the time mentioned ion the act of March 3, 1853.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Crockett, J.; Niles, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RHODES, J.

— The title to the land in controversy (it being a portion of a sixteenth section) vested in the state upon the approval of the survey of the township, unless there existed a valid pre-emption right to the land acquired under the act of Congress of March 3, 1853, the act granting the sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections to the state: See Sherman v. Buick, 45 Cal. 665.

The settlement, as appears by the declaratory statement, was not made until the year 1870, which was not within the time mentioned ion the act of March 3, 1853.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Crockett, J.; Niles, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-kingsbury-cal-1875.