Morrow v. Jeske

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morrow v. Jeske

273 S.W.3d 581, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2009 WL 111717

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2009·No. WD 68717, WD 68888·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin D. Morrow accused James J. Jeske, a security guard at Independence Shopping Center, and Jeske’s employer, SPG, Inc., a/k/a Simon Property Group, Inc., of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of Jeske and SPG, and Morrow appeals.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. We deny the pending motion to strike Morrow’s brief and dis *582 miss the appeal. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin D. Morrow accused James J. Jeske, a security guard at Independence Shopping Center, and Jeske’s employer, SPG, Inc., a/k/a Simon Property Group, Inc., of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of Jeske and SPG, and Morrow appeals.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. We deny the pending motion to strike Morrow’s brief and dis *582 miss the appeal. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Morrow v. Jeske, 273 S.W.3d 581, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2009 WL 111717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

273 S.W.3d 581 (Morrow v. Jeske) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.