Morrow v. Jeske
This text of 273 S.W.3d 581 (Morrow v. Jeske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Benjamin D. Morrow accused James J. Jeske, a security guard at Independence Shopping Center, and Jeske’s employer, SPG, Inc., a/k/a Simon Property Group, Inc., of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of Jeske and SPG, and Morrow appeals.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. We deny the pending motion to strike Morrow’s brief and dis *582 miss the appeal. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 S.W.3d 581, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2009 WL 111717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-jeske-moctapp-2009.