Morrow v. Farmers Hardware & Warehouse Co.

89 S.E. 377, 18 Ga. App. 303, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 312
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 27, 1916
Docket6969
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 377 (Morrow v. Farmers Hardware & Warehouse Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. Farmers Hardware & Warehouse Co., 89 S.E. 377, 18 Ga. App. 303, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The amount involved being less than $50, and there being an issue of fact in the ease, the trial judge did not err in disimssing the certiorari, an appeal to a jury in the justice’s court being the proper remedy. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 377, 18 Ga. App. 303, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-farmers-hardware-warehouse-co-gactapp-1916.