Morrow v. Dunlop Tire Corporation

772 So. 2d 1172, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 409, 2000 WL 868584
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morrow v. Dunlop Tire Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 140
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2000·No. 2971073·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause remanded, by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Dunlop Tire Corp., 772 So.2d 1167 (Ala.2000), that portion of the judgment of the trial court holding that Morrow’s injury was to a scheduled member is affirmed; that portion of the trial court’s judgment holding that Morrow’s second injury was not com-pensable is reversed; and the trial court is instructed to consider “whether [Morrow’s] second injury was a natural consequence of the primary injury.” 772 So.2d at 1171.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. Dunlop Tire Corporation, 772 So. 2d 1172, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 409, 2000 WL 868584 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

772 So. 2d 1172 (Morrow v. Dunlop Tire Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Dunlop Tire Corporation
772 So. 2d 1167 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)