Morrow v. Cahill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrow v. Cahill

278 A.D.2d 123, 718 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14002

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered on or about December 8, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondent Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s determination not to institute proceedings against petitioner’s former counsel, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, who is not the licensee, does not have standing since there is no direct and harmful effect on him (see, Matter of Altamore v Barrios-Paoli, 90 NY2d 378, 384; Mantell v New York State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 277 AD2d 96). Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered on or about December 8, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondent Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s determination not to institute proceedings against petitioner’s former counsel, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, who is not the licensee, does not have standing since there is no direct and harmful effect on him (see, Matter of Altamore v Barrios-Paoli, 90 NY2d 378, 384; Mantell v New York State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 277 AD2d 96). Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Morrow v. Cahill, 278 A.D.2d 123, 718 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 123 (Morrow v. Cahill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related