Morrow v. Brady

12 R.I. 130, 1878 R.I. LEXIS 40
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 28, 1878·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the rulings were correct on both points. . The object of the guaranty was to secure the payment of the rent. We ought, if we fairly can, to construe the guaranty so that it will accomplish this object. We so construe it, when we hold that the word “ occupy ” was used not simply in the narrower sense of actual or personal occupancy, but also in the larger sense of tenancy actually existing under the lease. Such use of the word is not uncommon. And that there was no ei’ror in the ruling on the second point, which the defendant can complain of, see 2 Parsons on Contracts, 29, and cases there cited. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. Brady, 12 R.I. 130, 1878 R.I. LEXIS 40 (R.I. 1878).

12 R.I. 130 (Morrow v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.