Morrissey v. State
This text of 451 So. 2d 526 (Morrissey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error by the trial court in refusing to sever appellant’s trial from that of his codefendant. McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla.1982). We also find no reversible error by the trial court in the admission of the fingerprint evidence or in its instructions to the jury. We agree with appellant, however, that his conviction for the lesser included offense of attempted robbery with a firearm cannot stand. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983).
Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for murder, but remand this cause to the trial court with directions that the conviction for attempted robbery with a firearm be vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 So. 2d 526, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrissey-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.