Morrissey v. Morrissey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrissey v. Morrissey

225 A.D.2d 779, 639 N.Y.2d 953, 639 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3157

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 779 (Morrissey v. Morrissey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrissey v. Morrissey, 225 A.D.2d 779, 639 N.Y.2d 953, 639 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellants’ cross motion requesting photocopies of the forensic reports or permission to copy these reports by hand since the court permitted counsel to review the reports in chambers (see, Matter of Scuderi-Forzano v Forzano, 213 AD2d 652). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellants’ cross motion requesting photocopies of the forensic reports or permission to copy these reports by hand since the court permitted counsel to review the reports in chambers (see, Matter of Scuderi-Forzano v Forzano, 213 AD2d 652). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 779, 639 N.Y.2d 953, 639 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrissey-v-morrissey-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack