Morrison v. Unizan Bank

795 N.E.2d 54, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1532
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 2003
Docket2003-1549
StatusPublished

This text of 795 N.E.2d 54 (Morrison v. Unizan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Unizan Bank, 795 N.E.2d 54, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1532 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 03AP-721. This cause is pending before the court as a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of proceedings and request for expedited consideration,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Resnick, J., concurs because the motion is moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 N.E.2d 54, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-unizan-bank-ohio-2003.