Morrison v. Tri-Boro Motors Co.

184 A.2d 242, 408 Pa. 415, 1962 Pa. LEXIS 519
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 25, 1962
DocketAppeals, Nos. 114 and 129
StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.2d 242 (Morrison v. Tri-Boro Motors Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Tri-Boro Motors Co., 184 A.2d 242, 408 Pa. 415, 1962 Pa. LEXIS 519 (Pa. 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

This automobile collision occurring in 1955 came on for trial before judge and jury in 1960 in which verdicts were returned in plaintiffs’ favor. Only the verdict for Kenneth Morrison is before us on these appeals.

Defendant’s (appellant in No. 129) contention being (1) the court below erred in refusing to withdraw a juror because of prejudicial remarks made by plaintiff’s counsel (2) the verdict of the jury was capricious and arbitrary and (3) was excessive.

Plaintiff (appellant in No. 114) contends (1) the question of an excessive verdict was not before the court below and (2) the verdict was not excessive.

The verdict for plaintiff was $9,850 and an order of court granted a new trial unless plaintiff remitted the amount in excess of $5,000.

An examination of the record reveals absolutely no grounds for these appeals and the court was entirely correct in its disposition of this litigation. There being no abuse of discretion or error of law the orders will be affirmed.

Orders affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno dissents and would reinstate the full amount of the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.2d 242, 408 Pa. 415, 1962 Pa. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-tri-boro-motors-co-pa-1962.