Morrison v. State

227 So. 3d 221, 2017 WL 4318530
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morrison v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17595
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-1054·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Romayne Morrison appeals his convictions for attempted sexual battery and battery.1 We affirm his conviction and sentence for attempted sexual battery. However, the battery was part and parcel of the attempted sexual battery, and a separate conviction for that charge was precluded by double jeopardy. See, e.g., Parton v. State, 59 So.3d 1212, 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“[A] defendant can be convicted of both [attempted] sexual battery and battery. However, if the battery is based on the same acts that form the basis for the sexual battery, double jeopardy prohibits dual convictions.” (citations omitted)); Garcia v. State, 769 So.2d 449, [222]*222449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“[B]ecause there was one continuous offense in this case, and the battery was not separate from the sexual battery, double jeopardy prohibits the multiple convictions and punishments.”). We therefore vacate Appellant’s conviction and sentence for battery.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrison v. State, 227 So. 3d 221, 2017 WL 4318530 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

227 So. 3d 221 (Morrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parton v. State
59 So. 3d 1212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Garcia v. State
769 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)