Morrison v. Sam Snead Schools of Golf of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrison v. Sam Snead Schools of Golf of New York, Inc.

13 A.D.2d 986, 216 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 13 A.D.2d 986 (Morrison v. Sam Snead Schools of Golf of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Sam Snead Schools of Golf of New York, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 986, 216 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a breach of contract action to recover unpaid salary and commissions, and for an accounting and other relief, in which a note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed and which is on the calendar awaiting trial, the defendant corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 10, 1961, granting plaintiff’s motion to examine it before trial. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. The plaintiff failed to show any facts warranting the granting of relief under paragraph (e) of subdivision (9) of the Statement of Readiness Rule of this court (see Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule, eff. Jan. 15, 1957, as amd.). Under this rule, when a plaintiff places a case upon the calendar by filing a note of issue and a statement of readiness without having taken the defendant’s deposition, such action ordinarily constitutes a waiver of the plaintiff’s right to take the deposition. It is only when unusual, unanticipated conditions develop thereafter that the court has discretion to depart from this interpretation of the rule. We find no such conditions in this case. The rule is intended to keep off the trial calendar all those eases which are not ready; and the rule prohibits any private understanding or arrangement between counsel for the purpose of avoiding it (cf. Price v. Brody, 7 A D 2d 204; Aaron v. St. Peter’s Hosp., 26 Misc 2d 515). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a breach of contract action to recover unpaid salary and commissions, and for an accounting and other relief, in which a note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed and which is on the calendar awaiting trial, the defendant corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 10, 1961, granting plaintiff’s motion to examine it before trial. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. The plaintiff failed to show any facts warranting the granting of relief under paragraph (e) of subdivision (9) of the Statement of Readiness Rule of this court (see Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule, eff. Jan. 15, 1957, as amd.). Under this rule, when a plaintiff places a case upon the calendar by filing a note of issue and a statement of readiness without having taken the defendant’s deposition, such action ordinarily constitutes a waiver of the plaintiff’s right to take the deposition. It is only when unusual, unanticipated conditions develop thereafter that the court has discretion to depart from this interpretation of the rule. We find no such conditions in this case. The rule is intended to keep off the trial calendar all those eases which are not ready; and the rule prohibits any private understanding or arrangement between counsel for the purpose of avoiding it (cf. Price v. Brody, 7 A D 2d 204; Aaron v. St. Peter’s Hosp., 26 Misc 2d 515). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 986, 216 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-sam-snead-schools-of-golf-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack