Morrison v. Pennell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 2009
Docket08-8396
StatusUnpublished

This text of Morrison v. Pennell (Morrison v. Pennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Pennell, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8396

STEVE MORRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW W. PENNELL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00127-GCM)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Morrison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steve Morrison appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Morrison v. Pennell, No. 5:08-cv-00127-GCM (W.D.N.C.

Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Morrison v. Pennell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-pennell-ca4-2009.