Morrison v. Okeechobee Co.

120 So. 556, 97 Fla. 296
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 120 So. 556 (Morrison v. Okeechobee Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Okeechobee Co., 120 So. 556, 97 Fla. 296 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said decree insofar 'as it allows a solicitor’s fee of $9,940.00. Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna; Brooks v. Roberts, decided at this term. It is ordered that the chancellor may take testimony of the complainants as to the amount of solicitor’s fees within the terms of the mortgage agreed by them, to be paid to their *297 solicitor for his services and amend the decree rendered by substituting such amount so proven for the sum allowed in the decree appealed from. Decree affirmed in other respects.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida Ex Rel. v. Atkinson Lasseter
146 So. 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Kidd v. City of Jacksonville
143 So. 307 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 556, 97 Fla. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-okeechobee-co-fla-1929.