Morrison v. Newport Wholesalers, Inc.

738 So. 2d 1037, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1999·No. No. 98-3429·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Morrison appeals an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying him unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. It was within the purview of the appeals referee to judge the witnesses’ credibility and to resolve the conflicts in the testimony. See Bozzo v. Safelite Glass Corp., 654 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Ahlswede v. Brumm Contracting, Inc., 583 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Heifetz v. Department of Bus. Regulation, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The referee resolved those conflicts in favor of the former employer and found that Morrison voluntarily left work without good cause. Accordingly, we affirm the order as it is supported by substantial competent evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrison v. Newport Wholesalers, Inc., 738 So. 2d 1037, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

738 So. 2d 1037 (Morrison v. Newport Wholesalers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peace River Distributing, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
80 So. 3d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Noel v. Cusanos Italian Bakery, Inc.
791 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)