Morrison v. Morrison

246 A.D.2d 634, 667 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 634 (Morrison v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Morrison, 246 A.D.2d 634, 667 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated August 1, 1996, which, sua sponte, directed him to pay sanctions in the aggregate sum of $1,000.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

We disagree with the defendant’s claim that, as a matter of law, he did nothing to warrant the imposition of sanctions.

A court may impose sanctions sua sponte, but the party to be sanctioned must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a], [d]; George v Wyckoff Hgts. Hosp., 222 AD2d 552; Walker v Weinstock, 213 AD2d 631). Here, the defendant was not afforded such an opportunity. Further, the court failed to state why it found the amount of the sanctions imposed to be appropriate (see, 22 NYCRR 130-I. 2; George v Wyckoff Hgts. Hosp., supra; Walker v Weinstock, supra). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing and the reconsideration of the issue of the appropriate amount of sanctions to be awarded, if any (see, Breslaw v Breslaw, 209 AD2d 662; Matter of Berrocales v Idels, 207 AD2d 446). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Cruise Fantasies, Ltd.
74 A.D.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re John T.
42 A.D.3d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Kamen v. Diaz-Kamen
40 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Robinson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical Center of Brooklyn
17 A.D.3d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Griffin v. Panzarin
305 A.D.2d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Drummond v. Drummond
291 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Household Finance Corp. v. Dynan
274 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Haddad v. Haddad
272 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Klein v. Seenauth
180 Misc. 2d 213 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D.2d 634, 667 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-morrison-nyappdiv-1998.