Morrison v. Montgomery
This text of 105 A. 425 (Morrison v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant in the action before the justice, having entered an appeal in this court, it became necessary that the respondent should be summoned to appear and answer the appeal. On the return of the summons with the sheriff’s return thereon of non est inventus, an alias summons should have been issued, at least before the next term. 2 Woolley, Del. Prac. § 1427. It is too late to do so now. This failure amounts to neglect to prosecute the appeal. It is, therefore, dismissed, and the prothonotary is directed to remit the record to the justice and enter judgment for the respondent for costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A. 425, 30 Del. 222, 7 Boyce 222, 1918 Del. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-montgomery-delsuperct-1918.