Morrison v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.

New York Supreme Court

Morrison v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.

26 N.Y.S. 1121, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637

DecidedDecember 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1121 (Morrison v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co., 26 N.Y.S. 1121, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant, entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court. The case has been here before upon an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing her complaint, and we then expressed our views of the case, and decided that the dismissal of the complaint was erroneous, and that the case was one for the jury. There has now been a new trial, and a verdict for the plaintiff. Our views were fully expressed in the former opinion, (69 Hun, 100, 23 N. Y. Supp. 257,) and require no. further elaboration at this time. The case of the plaintiff was somewhat strengthened upon the second trial, and the verdict meets our approbation. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant, entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court. The case has been here before upon an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing her complaint, and we then expressed our views of the case, and decided that the dismissal of the complaint was erroneous, and that the case was one for the jury. There has now been a new trial, and a verdict for the plaintiff. Our views were fully expressed in the former opinion, (69 Hun, 100, 23 N. Y. Supp. 257,) and require no. further elaboration at this time. The case of the plaintiff was somewhat strengthened upon the second trial, and the verdict meets our approbation. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1121, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-metropolitan-telephone-telegraph-co-nysupct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack