Morrison v. Laird

Eleventh Circuit

Morrison v. Laird

161 F. App'x 829

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 05-13605; D.C. Docket No. 03-00381-CV-OC-10-GRJ·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court, on June 14, 2005, dismissed with prejudice petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Record, Vol. 2 at Tab 32. The court dismissed the petition because it “simply reasserted] an argument that was raised and rejected on direct appeal and in [petitioner’s] subsequent [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 and other collateral proceedings.” Id.

Petitioner now appeals the court’s decision. We find no merit in his petition for [830] the reasons stated in the district court’s June 14 order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court, on June 14, 2005, dismissed with prejudice petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Record, Vol. 2 at Tab 32. The court dismissed the petition because it “simply reasserted] an argument that was raised and rejected on direct appeal and in [petitioner’s] subsequent [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 and other collateral proceedings.” Id.

Petitioner now appeals the court’s decision. We find no merit in his petition for [830] the reasons stated in the district court’s June 14 order.

AFFIRMED.

Morrison v. Laird, 161 F. App'x 829 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 829 (Morrison v. Laird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related