Morrison v. Laird

Eleventh Circuit

Morrison v. Laird

161 F. App'x 829

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 2005

DocketNo. 05-13605; D.C. Docket No. 03-00381-CV-OC-10-GRJ

StatusPublished

This text of 161 F. App'x 829 (Morrison v. Laird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Laird, 161 F. App'x 829 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court, on June 14, 2005, dismissed with prejudice petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Record, Vol. 2 at Tab 32. The court dismissed the petition because it “simply reasserted] an argument that was raised and rejected on direct appeal and in [petitioner’s] subsequent [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 and other collateral proceedings.” Id.

Petitioner now appeals the court’s decision. We find no merit in his petition for [830]*830the reasons stated in the district court’s June 14 order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court, on June 14, 2005, dismissed with prejudice petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Record, Vol. 2 at Tab 32. The court dismissed the petition because it “simply reasserted] an argument that was raised and rejected on direct appeal and in [petitioner’s] subsequent [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 and other collateral proceedings.” Id.

Petitioner now appeals the court’s decision. We find no merit in his petition for [830]*830the reasons stated in the district court’s June 14 order.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 F. App'x 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-laird-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack