Morrison v. Gilman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrison v. Gilman

254 A.D. 686, 3 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7139

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1938·Published

Opinion

In a foreclosure action, judgment for plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was never any actual or unconditional tender by the subsequent owner in satisfaction of the amount due for interest, taxes and the costs. It was not shown on the trial that he was able and willing to pay, and no money was produced or made available to the plaintiffs so that the defaults might be remedied and the complaint dismissed under section 1077-e of the Civil Practice Act. Other questions raised are not necessary for the determination of this appeal and, therefore, are not decided. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a foreclosure action, judgment for plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was never any actual or unconditional tender by the subsequent owner in satisfaction of the amount due for interest, taxes and the costs. It was not shown on the trial that he was able and willing to pay, and no money was produced or made available to the plaintiffs so that the defaults might be remedied and the complaint dismissed under section 1077-e of the Civil Practice Act. Other questions raised are not necessary for the determination of this appeal and, therefore, are not decided. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Morrison v. Gilman, 254 A.D. 686, 3 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 686 (Morrison v. Gilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.