Morrison v. Fayette County

17 A. 755, 127 Pa. 110, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1088
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 27, 1889
DocketNo. 334
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 17 A. 755 (Morrison v. Fayette County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. Fayette County, 17 A. 755, 127 Pa. 110, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1088 (Pa. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The act of February 5, 1869, fixes the pay of the county auditors of Fayette county at three dollars per day, but gives them no mileage. It was a local act, evidently passed because it was desired by that county, and has been enforced since 1869. The act of May 12, 1887, is a general law, fixing the pay of county auditors throughout the state at three dollars per day, “ together with six cents per mile circular, from and to their homes, once for each and every week so employed.” The present county auditors of Fayette county claim that they are now entitled to mileage under the act of 1887, but the learned judge below thought otherwise and disallowed their claim, upon the ground that the local act of 1869 is not repealed by the general law of 1887. In this we see no error. It may very well be that the auditors of Fayette county are as much entitled to mileage as are those of other counties in the state. As an abstract proposition this may be conceded. But their local law is in the way. Now that it gives them no advantage over other parts of the state they may perhaps see their way to get it repealed, in which event the general law would apply. For the present they must be content with the law as it has stood for the last twenty years.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kistler v. Carbon County
35 A.2d 733 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Rutherford Water Co. v. Harrisburg.
146 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Southwestern National Bank v. Riegner
140 A. 615 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Flemming v. Bush
43 Pa. Super. 405 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
State ex rel. Seng v. Peter
112 N.W. 866 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)
Nissley v. Lancaster County
27 Pa. Super. 405 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Loyalsock Township Road
26 Pa. Super. 219 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Commonwealth v. Vetterlein
21 Pa. Super. 587 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Wilford v. Draper
1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 167 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1902)
Moore v. Lancaster County
1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 210 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1902)
Commonwealth ex rel. Cambria County v. Lloyd
2 Pa. Super. 6 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Commonwealth v. Phila. & Erie R. R.
30 A. 145 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A. 755, 127 Pa. 110, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-fayette-county-pa-1889.