Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co

W.D. Washington

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co

DecidedJanuary 13, 2020

Docket2:18-cv-01316

StatusUnknown

This text of Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co (Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 AT SEATTLE

3 MIKESHIA MORRISON, 4 Plaintiff, C18-1316 TSZ 5 v. MINUTE ORDER 6 ESURANCE INSURANCE CO, 7 Defendant.

8 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 9 (1) Oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, docket no. 57, 10 is SET for Friday, January 24, 2020, at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Plaintiff’s Motion is RENOTED to January 24, 2020. The parties 11 should be prepared to focus their arguments on class certification issues under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) & (3). The parties should 12 also be prepared to discuss modifying the class definition to the form used by Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2422592, at *1 13 (W.D. Wash. June 10, 2019), as follows: 14 All Esurance insureds in the state of Washington who, from August 6, 2012 to August 6, 2018, had a Personal Injury 15 Protection (PIP) claim denied, terminated, or limited by Esurance based in part on the ground that they had reached 16 Maximum Medical Improvement.

17 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 18 Dated this 13th day of January, 2020. 19 William M. McCool 20 Clerk 21 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 AT SEATTLE

3 MIKESHIA MORRISON, 4 Plaintiff, C18-1316 TSZ 5 v. MINUTE ORDER 6 ESURANCE INSURANCE CO, 7 Defendant.

8 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 9 (1) Oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, docket no. 57, 10 is SET for Friday, January 24, 2020, at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Plaintiff’s Motion is RENOTED to January 24, 2020. The parties 11 should be prepared to focus their arguments on class certification issues under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) & (3). The parties should 12 also be prepared to discuss modifying the class definition to the form used by Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2422592, at *1 13 (W.D. Wash. June 10, 2019), as follows: 14 All Esurance insureds in the state of Washington who, from August 6, 2012 to August 6, 2018, had a Personal Injury 15 Protection (PIP) claim denied, terminated, or limited by Esurance based in part on the ground that they had reached 16 Maximum Medical Improvement.

17 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 18 Dated this 13th day of January, 2020. 19 William M. McCool 20 Clerk 21 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 22

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-esurance-insurance-co-wawd-2020.