Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co

W.D. Washington

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided January 13, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-01316·Unknown

Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Plaintiff, C18-1316 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER Defendant.

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, docket no. 57, is SET for Friday, January 24, 2020, at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Plaintiff’s Motion is RENOTED to January 24, 2020. The parties should be prepared to focus their arguments on class certification issues under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) & (3). The parties should also be prepared to discuss modifying the class definition to the form used by Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2422592, at *1 (W.D. Wash. June 10, 2019), as follows: All Esurance insureds in the state of Washington who, from August 6, 2012 to August 6, 2018, had a Personal Injury Protection (PIP) claim denied, terminated, or limited by Esurance based in part on the ground that they had reached Maximum Medical Improvement.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. Dated this 13th day of January, 2020. William M. McCool Clerk s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Plaintiff, C18-1316 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER Defendant.

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, docket no. 57, is SET for Friday, January 24, 2020, at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Plaintiff’s Motion is RENOTED to January 24, 2020. The parties should be prepared to focus their arguments on class certification issues under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) & (3). The parties should also be prepared to discuss modifying the class definition to the form used by Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2422592, at *1 (W.D. Wash. June 10, 2019), as follows: All Esurance insureds in the state of Washington who, from August 6, 2012 to August 6, 2018, had a Personal Injury Protection (PIP) claim denied, terminated, or limited by Esurance based in part on the ground that they had reached Maximum Medical Improvement.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. Dated this 13th day of January, 2020. William M. McCool Clerk s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Pincite

Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co (Morrison v. Esurance Insurance Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.