Morrison v. Columbia Casualty Co.
This text of 109 S.E.2d 80 (Morrison v. Columbia Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While counsel for the defendant in error in this case have appeared both by brief and by oral argument in this court, there is no entry of service or written acknowledgement of service on the writ of error as required by Code (Ann.) § 6-911, and this court, therefore, has no jurisdiction to consider any question raised by the writ of error. Accord[629]*629ingly, the writ of error must be dismissed. Harper v. Atlanta & W. P. R. Co., 204 Ga. 311 (49 S. E. 2d 513).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 S.E.2d 80, 99 Ga. App. 628, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-columbia-casualty-co-gactapp-1959.