Morrison v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrison v. City of New York

255 A.D. 839, 7 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5537

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1938·Published

Opinion

Since the complaint asks that the alleged illegal payment be restored to the treasury of the city of New York, we thinly that the city is a proper party if not a necessary one. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Since the complaint asks that the alleged illegal payment be restored to the treasury of the city of New York, we thinly that the city is a proper party if not a necessary one. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Morrison v. City of New York, 255 A.D. 839, 7 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 839 (Morrison v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.