Morrison v. Chow

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2007·No. 07-1540·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1540

PATRICIA A. MORRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELAINE CHOW, Secretary of Labor; CARLOS GUTIERREZ, U. S. Secretary of Commerce,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv- 01109)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia A. Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patricia A. Morrison appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her civil action and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Morrison v. Chow, No. 8:06-cv-01109

(D. Md. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrison v. Chow, (4th Cir. 2007).

Morrison v. Chow (Morrison v. Chow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.