Morrison v. California
This text of 288 U.S. 591 (Morrison v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178, 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502. (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258, 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225, 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 U.S. 591, 53 S. Ct. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-california-scotus-1933.