Morrison v. California
288 U.S. 591, 53 S. Ct. 401
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 1933·No. No. 662·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178, 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502. (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258, 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225, 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrison v. California, 288 U.S. 591, 53 S. Ct. 401 (1933).
288 U.S. 591 (Morrison v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patterson v. New York
432 U.S. 197 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Lublin v. Central Islip Psychiatric Center
56 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Laietta
281 N.E.2d 157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Jenkins v. United States
146 A.2d 444 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1958)
Rogers v. District of Columbia
31 A.2d 649 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1943)
People v. Cordero
122 P.2d 648 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
People v. Lenore
33 P.2d 892 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Morrison v. California
291 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1934)