Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp.
556 P.2d 726, 27 Or. App. 635, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1502
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 6, 1976·No. No. 95247, CA 6867·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The referee found that claimant suffered from a compensable occupational disease of the back. The Workmen’s Compensation Board denied the claim, however, because they found that claimant was not credible and because there was insufficient medical evidence to support a finding of compensable occupational disease.1 The trial court affirmed the denial and, having reviewed the record, we too affirm the denial. Jenkins v. SAIF, 21 Or App 447, 451, 535 P2d 124 (1975).
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp., 556 P.2d 726, 27 Or. App. 635, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1502 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
556 P.2d 726 (Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. Boise Cascade Corp.
561 P.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)