Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp.

556 P.2d 726, 27 Or. App. 635, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1502

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 6, 1976

DocketNo. 95247, CA 6867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 P.2d 726 (Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Boise Cascade Corp., 556 P.2d 726, 27 Or. App. 635, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1502 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The referee found that claimant suffered from a compensable occupational disease of the back. The Workmen’s Compensation Board denied the claim, however, because they found that claimant was not credible and because there was insufficient medical evidence to support a finding of compensable occupational disease.¹ The trial court affirmed the denial and, having reviewed the record, we too affirm the denial. Jenkins v. SAIF, 21 Or App 447, 451, 535 P2d 124 (1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The referee found that claimant suffered from a compensable occupational disease of the back. The Workmen’s Compensation Board denied the claim, however, because they found that claimant was not credible and because there was insufficient medical evidence to support a finding of compensable occupational disease.¹ The trial court affirmed the denial and, having reviewed the record, we too affirm the denial. Jenkins v. SAIF, 21 Or App 447, 451, 535 P2d 124 (1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 P.2d 726, 27 Or. App. 635, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-boise-cascade-corp-orctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack