Morrison ex rel. Rowe v. C. J. Jones Lumber Co.
165 So. 2d 758, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2818
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must he and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrison ex rel. Rowe v. C. J. Jones Lumber Co., 165 So. 2d 758, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2818 (Fla. 1964).
165 So. 2d 758 (Morrison ex rel. Rowe v. C. J. Jones Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florio v. State Ex Rel. Epperson
119 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Florida Publishing Company v. Copeland
89 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Tracey v. State
130 So. 2d 605 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Redditt v. State
84 So. 2d 317 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Vaughn v. Smith
96 So. 2d 143 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Dicks v. Colonial Finance Corporation
85 So. 2d 874 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Hamilton v. State
88 So. 2d 606 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Pittman v. Roberts
122 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Red Top Cab & Baggage Company v. Grady
99 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Davidson v. Bezant
132 So. 488 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Norris Et Ux. v. Eikenberry
137 So. 128 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Stanley v. Powers
169 So. 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
C. J. Jones Lumber Co. v. Morrison
154 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
De Fonce Construction Co. v. Ewing
99 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)