Morrison Dental Associates, P.C. v. Wilcher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morrison Dental Associates, P.C. v. Wilcher

303 S.E.2d 775, 166 Ga. App. 236, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2114

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 7, 1983

Docket65469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.E.2d 775 (Morrison Dental Associates, P.C. v. Wilcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison Dental Associates, P.C. v. Wilcher, 303 S.E.2d 775, 166 Ga. App. 236, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2114 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Shulman, Chief Judge.

Wilcher, while an employee of Morrison, made a claim on a group medical insurance policy issued by Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”). The claim was denied on the ground that coverage had not commenced at the time of the surgery which formed the basis of the claim. Wilcher sued her employer on the ground that she had been assured by Morrison that she was covered by the insurance policy and would not have incurred the expense but for those assurances. Morrison filed a third-party action against Lincoln. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to Lincoln.

Wilcher’s surgery was performed in July 1981. Lincoln’s position in this litigation is that the application for coverage for Wilcher was not received by it until July 13,1981. Under the terms of the policy, new employees became eligible for insurance “from the first day of the calendar month following acceptance by the Insurance Company.” Accordingly, August 1,1981, would have been the earliest that coverage could commence pursuant to an application received by this insurer in July.

If, however, an application was received in June, it would have been possible for coverage to commence on July 1,1981. Appellant’s bookkeeper, Mrs. Morrison, swore by affidavit that she submitted in May an application signed by Wilcher; that that application was returned because it was not properly completed; that she subsequently mailed another application for Wilcher in late June; and that the second application was not returned by the insurer.

In light of the conflicting testimony by affidavit concerning when and how many applications were sent and received by the various parties, issues of fact still exist which preclude the entry of judgment as a matter of law for either party. It was, therefore, error to [237]*237enter judgment for Lincoln. OCGA § 9-11-56 (Code Ann. § 81A-156).

Decided April 7, 1983. Ronald H. Cohen, Noble L. Boykin, Jr., for appellant. Morton G. Forbes, Robert M. Ray, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shulman, Chief Judge.

Wilcher, while an employee of Morrison, made a claim on a group medical insurance policy issued by Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”). The claim was denied on the ground that coverage had not commenced at the time of the surgery which formed the basis of the claim. Wilcher sued her employer on the ground that she had been assured by Morrison that she was covered by the insurance policy and would not have incurred the expense but for those assurances. Morrison filed a third-party action against Lincoln. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to Lincoln.

Wilcher’s surgery was performed in July 1981. Lincoln’s position in this litigation is that the application for coverage for Wilcher was not received by it until July 13,1981. Under the terms of the policy, new employees became eligible for insurance “from the first day of the calendar month following acceptance by the Insurance Company.” Accordingly, August 1,1981, would have been the earliest that coverage could commence pursuant to an application received by this insurer in July.

If, however, an application was received in June, it would have been possible for coverage to commence on July 1,1981. Appellant’s bookkeeper, Mrs. Morrison, swore by affidavit that she submitted in May an application signed by Wilcher; that that application was returned because it was not properly completed; that she subsequently mailed another application for Wilcher in late June; and that the second application was not returned by the insurer.

In light of the conflicting testimony by affidavit concerning when and how many applications were sent and received by the various parties, issues of fact still exist which preclude the entry of judgment as a matter of law for either party. It was, therefore, error to [237]*237enter judgment for Lincoln. OCGA § 9-11-56 (Code Ann. § 81A-156).

Decided April 7, 1983. Ronald H. Cohen, Noble L. Boykin, Jr., for appellant. Morton G. Forbes, Robert M. Ray, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.E.2d 775, 166 Ga. App. 236, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-dental-associates-pc-v-wilcher-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack