Morris W. Zack and Sarah Zack, and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, And

Sixth Circuit

Morris W. Zack and Sarah Zack, and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, And

245 F.2d 235, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 596, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5463

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 19, 1957

Docket12953_1

StatusPublished

This text of 245 F.2d 235 (Morris W. Zack and Sarah Zack, and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris W. Zack and Sarah Zack, and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, And, 245 F.2d 235, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 596, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5463 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact, opinion and decision of the Tax Court were not clearly erroneous; and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.

Judge STEWART dissents for the reasons expressed in Judge WITHEY’S dissenting opinion in the Tax Court. 25 T.C. 676, 681.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact, opinion and decision of the Tax Court were not clearly erroneous; and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.

Judge STEWART dissents for the reasons expressed in Judge WITHEY’S dissenting opinion in the Tax Court. 25 T.C. 676, 681.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F.2d 235, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 596, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-w-zack-and-sarah-zack-and-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-and-ca6-1957.